Heads up: Some unrestrained adult language in this following e-mail to House Van Jakerstein.
As you read below e-mail, resist the temptation to ask me how Ismail did it. Because kittehs, I don’t know. Giant overprescription plus lots of ciliary spasm myopia? Maybe. Is he overstating his -5 into a -7 because of the close-up distance? While that’s actually not entirely inaccurate, it’s also twisting the numbers a bit.
Anyway, here it is:
What do I say to this? Not a whole lot. Jake shrugged.
Figure maybe really a starting -5.00 diopters, with a healthy bit of overprescription and really a lot of ciliary spasm. You can go as high as -6 and never have measurable axial elongation, so the explanation of focusing muscle caused myopia is at least plausible.
The real question is, what will Ismail do when he no longer needs glasses to see clearly? New sports, new adventures? Or even more importantly, what will you do?
Cheers,
-Jake
You don't have to watch it climb
Stop the slide. Start walking it back.
On glasses, your number drifts up a little every year. The trial hands you the step-by-step to reverse the direction — with Jake checking your numbers.
Where are your eyes now? Tap your prescription:
"I write this blog. I also built the step-by-step system behind it — and I'll look at your numbers personally." — Jake Steiner
Real, documented: Helmut, 77 — −5.25 → −1.50 D · 60,000+ members · 12 years
$1,188 $1 today · cancel in two clicks · 60-day money-back
