Case registry: what it is
This registry documents people who chose to report their own myopia-reduction results, most of them working from the free method on their own rather than through the guided program. It is only a small fraction of everyone who has applied the method, and it deliberately leaves out the much larger BackTo20/20 program-participant dataset, which is held separately. What it captures is a conservative floor: the kind of results people reach largely self-directed. Each case carries start and end diopter numbers as stated by the person, the time window, and a verification class describing how strong the supporting evidence is. Every case links back to its original report, and the full dataset is downloadable below.
It is not a clinical trial and not a prospective cohort. Cases are self-selected success reports: members who improved and chose to write in. Dropout and non-response rates cannot be derived from this collection, and no claim of a population success rate is made from it. A cohort-level dataset with denominators, drawn from program member data, is planned as a separate release.
How this registry was built
EndMyopia started in 2008 and has spread almost entirely by word of mouth, well beyond what its own channels can count. Those channels alone include a private community of tens of thousands, a comparably sized email following, a daily blog readership built up over more than a decade, and a YouTube channel. A portion of the people who apply the method report their measured results back, and this registry is the documented part of those outcomes, spanning 2013 to 2026. As far as we can establish, no comparable decade-long, self-directed adult myopia-reduction record exists anywhere else.
The reports are collected the slow way. Participants receive periodic check-in emails asking how their eyesight is progressing, and their replies, together with posts to the EndMyopia forum, the private Facebook group, and blog and video comments, are the source material. This has run continuously for years, and several hundred further responses remain in the email archive, not yet entered.
A case is one person with a documented starting and current refraction, or a documented move to no correction. Every case links back to its original, dated public report, whether an email, a forum post, a Facebook post, or a video, so any number here can be traced to where it came from.
Cases are graded by strength of evidence, from self-measured up to independent confirmation (see the verification classes below). Of the 363 documented cases, 61 carry a third-party or official-record signal: an optometrist or ophthalmologist prescription, a passed DMV or driving-licence vision test, or a removed corrective-lens restriction on a licence.
The public dataset is de-identified, with the name column removed while source-post links are kept so the data stays auditable. The named master file and the underlying email correspondence are held privately and are not published. Corrections or removal requests go to [email protected].
The honest limits sit alongside the scale. This is a self-reported registry, subject to selection and survivorship bias, since people who improve are more likely to write back. It does not prove that the method reliably reverses established adult myopia. What it does provide, in the open and over more than a decade, is a large and unusually well-sourced body of individual reductions, a real share of them independently confirmed.
Verification classes
Each case is assigned the strongest class its published text actually supports — assigned conservatively, with the supporting quote preserved in the dataset.
| Class | Meaning | Included cases |
|---|---|---|
| 1 — Third-party exam reported | The member reports specific eye-exam numbers from an optometrist or ophthalmologist confirming the reduction. This is a member’s report of a third-party record — not the record itself. | 34 |
| 2 — Official record | A driving-license vision restriction was removed or changed following a required vision test. | 8 |
| 3 — Dated self-measurements | The member reports their own Snellen-chart or centimeter measurements with numbers and time anchoring. | 49 |
| 4 — Numbers, method unclear | Start and end numbers are stated, but the measurement method is not. | 131 |
| 5 — Published report, no numbers | A first-person account without extractable start/end numbers. Counted as a published report, never as a case. | 51 |
How the numbers are computed
- People, not posts. 55 members have two or more progress posts; each series is merged into one case using the earliest starting numbers and the latest reported numbers.
- Diopter values are the worse eye’s spherical value as stated by the member; cylinder is excluded from deltas.
- Annualized rates are published only for cases with a 12-month-or-longer window (n=57, median 1.5 D/yr). Annualizing a two-month report overstates a sustained rate, so shorter cases show only the raw change and its window.
- Exclusions (16 cases): any case involving prior laser surgery, child cases (this registry is adult-only in v1), and cases whose numbers are internally inconsistent pending re-review. Exclusions are listed in the dataset with reasons, not silently removed.
Honest reading of the rate data: featured cases skew faster than typical. Computed across all cases regardless of window length, the median annualized rate would be roughly 2.6 D/yr — that number is inflated by short-window annualization and by selection of notable progress for publication, which is why this registry does not use it. The defensible figure is the 12-month-plus median of 1.5 D/yr, consistent with the ~1 D/yr typical rate communicated across this site.
Verified-signal cases (classes 1–2)
The 42 cases below carry the strongest verification available in published reports. Numbers appear exactly as the member stated them.
| Case | Member | Start | Latest | Change | Window | Class | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EM-0033 | Megan | -10 | -6 | 4.0 D | — | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0008 | Nate | -6.75 | -3.25 normalized (reads 20/20 with it); optometrist at start of year: -4.75 fully corrected | 3.5 D | 34 mo | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0013 | Steve | OS -7.50 -1.00cyl / OD -6.00 -1.25cyl (May 2013 exam) | wearing OS -5.00D / OD -4.00D spherical, seeing 20/40 (20/25 or better in contacts, same script) | 2.5 D | 3 mo | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 |
| EM-0016 | Stefanie | -9.50 (title) | 1.5 diopters lower lenses (~-7), seeing 20/40 (March) | 2.5 D | 1 mo | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 |
| EM-0027 | Kim | -6.5 L (cyl -0.5) / -7.5 R (cyl -1), January 2015 | -4.25 L (no astigmatism) / -5 R (cyl -0.5), optometrist trial-lens exam Sept 2017 | 2.5 D | 32 mo | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0036 | Pedro | -3.00 | -0.50 | 2.5 D | — | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 |
| EM-0028 | Aniket | -6.75 | -4.50 | 2.25 D | — | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 |
| EM-0007 | Nathan | -6.75 (with some small amount of astigmatism) | -4.75 | 2.0 D | 24 mo | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0014 | Roy | contacts Right: -8.00 cyl -0.75 axis 010 / Left: -8.50 cyl -0.75 axis 180 | -6.5 both eyes (equalized) | 2.0 D | 5 mo | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 report 3 |
| EM-0020 | Mike | -4 (in 2013) | -2 (official eye exam this year) | 2.0 D | 36 mo | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0023 | Andrea | -5.00 | -3.00 | 2.0 D | — | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0032 | Dave | -4.50 | -2.50 | 2.0 D | — | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0006 | Steve | OS -7.50 / OD -6.00 (cyl 1 OS, 1.25 OD) | (OS) -5.75D | (OD) -4.50D spherical, seeing 20/30 | 1.75 D | 3 mo | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 |
| EM-0002 | John | -5.5 -0.5 right eye / -5.0 -0.5 left eye | -4.00 for both eyes (20/20) | 1.5 D | 5 mo | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 |
| EM-0005 | David | -4.00 (2 years prior) | -2.50 (clears 20/20 at exam); optometrist’s own determination -3.00 to -3.25 | 1.5 D | 24 mo | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0011 | Jon | -7.75 right / -8 left, with minor astigmatism | OD -6.00 Cyl -0.25 @ 035 / OS -6.50 Cyl -0.25 @ 137 (OD exam 11/11/2015) | 1.5 D | 8 mo | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 report 3 |
| EM-0012 | Kim | -6.5 left / -7.5 right | 20/20 on Snellen with -5 L / -6 R; new normalized ordered -4.75 L / -5.75 R | 1.5 D | 3 mo | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 report 3 |
| EM-0017 | Despina | contacts R -5.00 / L -5.50 | glasses -3.50D right / -4.00D left (third normalized) | 1.5 D | 2 mo | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 report 3 report 4 |
| EM-0021 | Andrew | -3.75 D | -2.25 D | 1.5 D | — | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0022 | Mina | glasses Sept 2016: -6.25sph -0.25cyl / -6.75sph -0.50cyl (R/L) | glasses Jan 2017: -4.75 / -5.25 (R/L), spherical only; contacts -4.25 / -4.75 | 1.5 D | 4 mo | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0025 | Jayesh | -8.50 D | -7.00 D | 1.5 D | — | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0034 | Roger | -3.50 (fitted a year ago) | -2.00 (self-chosen glasses, full distance clarity) | 1.5 D | 12 mo | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0026 | Kristen | -4.25 | -3.00 | 1.25 D | 2 mo | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 report 3 |
| EM-0031 | Ani | -7.00 D | -5.75 D | 1.25 D | 2 mo | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0004 | Nadim | contacts 9.00 (OS) / 10.00 (OD); glasses 9.75 (OS) / 11.25 (OD) historical | exam-reduced to -8.50/-9.50 with 20/20; later trial contacts -8.00 and -9.00 with reported perfect vision | 1.0 D | 22 mo | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 |
| EM-0010 | Eli | -8.00 | -7.00 contacts (20/20 at eye doctor) | 1.0 D | 19 mo | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 |
| EM-0037 | — | about 1 to 1,5 diopters (maximum/fallback state; a little more on the left eye) | R: -0,5 sph / L: -0,25 with -0,75 cyl (90°) | 1.0 D | 12 mo | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0015 | Steve | OS -7.50d, -1c / OD -6.00d, -1.25c (Feb 2014) | OS -6.75d, -1c / OD -5.25d, -1c (optometrist, May 2015) | 0.75 D | 15 mo | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0009 | Matthew | OD -2.50 *-.25 *177 OS -2.00 *-.50 *177 (previous normalized; original start not stated) | OD -2.25 OS -1.75 *-.25 *177 | 0.25 D | — | Exam-reported | report 1 report 2 |
| EM-0018 | Atikur | -4.00 (old glasses he wore) | -3.75 (from optometrist) | 0.25 D | — | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0001 | Liam | Left: -5.25, 0.50 CYL / Right: -5.00 (July 2012) | — | — | 14 mo | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0019 | Nakanita | -3 | — | — | — | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0029 | Nicole | — | — | — | — | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0035 | Tyler | — | — | — | 12 mo | Exam-reported | report |
| EM-0038 | Chris | — | — | — | 24 mo | Official record | report 1 report 2 |
| EM-0039 | Emily | — | — | — | — | Official record | report |
| EM-0040 | — | — | — | — | — | Official record | report |
| EM-0041 | Jordan | — | — | — | — | Official record | report |
| EM-0042 | Srinidhi | — | — | — | — | Official record | report 1 report 2 |
| EM-0043 | Brenda | -2.00 | — | — | — | Official record | report |
| EM-0044 | — | — | — | — | — | Official record | report |
| EM-0045 | — | — | — | — | — | Official record | report |
Download the dataset
The complete registry — all 363 cases including classes 3–5, exclusions with reasons, verification quotes, and source links — is available for download and independent recomputation:
- em-case-registry-v2.0.csv — flat table, one row per case (73 KB)
- em-case-registry-v2.0.json — full records including verification quotes and per-case source lists (198 KB)
- em-case-registry-v2.0.zip — both files (39 KB)
Dataset version 2.0 · generated 2026-07-09 · CC BY 4.0 with attribution to endmyopia.org. Corrections welcome: if any case is misclassified, the registry is revised and the change is logged here.
Version history
- v1.0 (2026-06-10) — initial release from the 2013–2026 published-report archive: 466 reports, 289 cases, verification-classed and person-merged.
- v2.0 (2026-07-09): added 74 self-reported cases documented since v1.0 (three child cases excluded from the adult set, two duplicates merged). 363 cases, 344 in the adult analysis set.
Citable deposit & author record
The registry is deposited as a permanent, versioned, citable research object and described in an accompanying preprint. Author: Jake Steiner, Research Scientist, Steiner Research (ORCID 0009-0004-6064-135X · Wikidata).
- Dataset: 344 adult cases (v2.0), CC BY 4.0. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21016339. Mirrored on GitHub and Hugging Face.
- Preprint: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21230819 (Wikidata).
The evidence behind these numbers: for a neutral, cited review of what the peer-reviewed science says about whether myopia can be reduced or reversed — the eye’s growth-regulation mechanism, the clinical evidence that axial growth is modifiable, and what is and isn’t established — see Can myopia be reversed? What the evidence actually says.
Related: Is EndMyopia legit?. The evidence, the mainstream criticism, and the public dataset in one place.
Cite this registry: Steiner J. (2026). A self-reported registry of adult myopia reduction: 273 documented cases (2013–2026). Preprint. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21230819.